Ruchi’s J506 Weblog

January 29, 2008

A Leader….with no followers?

Filed under: Intrapersonal — rrajasek @ 10:26 pm

I don’t believe anyone can be a leader without followers….
One can lead a project, a company or even an entire industry, but to effectively accomplish those goals, one must first successfully lead people. It takes a comprehensive list of talents to reach leadership levels, and co-workers will respect and perhaps even admire that expertise, but converting them to believers — followers — takes more than some fancy strategic game plan. Some of the most common themes that resonated from the articles – especially the one from Kotter was the ability to communicate, credibility, trust and motivation — often referred to as “the soft skills” in the real world. The human element of doing business and leading one can never be dispensed of and many of the bright ideas fall short of execution due to the lack of attention this critical component deserves.

Although people tend to describe these types of skills as ’soft,’ the most successful leaders (as evidenced in “Good to Great”) understand that to motivate, persuade and advance the business’s interests, such skills are essential, indispensable and equally important to the ‘hard’ skills’. A direct connection needs to be made between a leader and a follower (as witnessed in the video we watched last class) with a clear message that has some human element of emotion. It also has to communicate clearly the “WIIFM” (what’s in it for me?) factor as this helps a follower to understand what the expectations are and how it will benefit them.

As a manager and team lead I have personally refined the following skills that have benefited me:

- Avoid dry, technical, jargon-heavy language. This makes individuals feel “talked down to” more often than not. People hate being made to feel ignorant and would be reluctant to ask questions since they don’t want to depict themselves as unknowledgeable.

- Lead by example. There is no better way to have people follow you than to model the behavior you expect yourself. Although it might sound cliche, Actions DO speak louder than words.

- Political Neutrality – I was quite amazed to find the word “politics” or “office politics” not mentioned in any of my readings thus far in this course. Anyhow, the amount of self-discipline it requires to not get involved in office politics (especially the ones involving your boss!) is remarkable. There is no good outcome of this in my opinion and as a matter of fact co-workers will eventually appreciate you for it. This could be categorized as “tough empathy” depending on which side of the equation you are – a leader or a follower.

January 21, 2008

Org

Filed under: Organzational — rrajasek @ 7:48 pm

Interpersonal

Filed under: Interpersonal — rrajasek @ 7:47 pm

Blog organization

Filed under: General — rrajasek @ 7:47 pm

My posts have been segregated into 3 new categories – Intrapersonal, Interpersonal and Organizational. You can find these under the ‘Categories’ section on the right.

I found this paradigm easier since it follows the course progression…hope it is convenient for you as well!

The concept of leadership

Filed under: Intrapersonal — rrajasek @ 7:41 pm

“Twelve O’Clock High” was a good introduction to the concept of leadership. Its illustration of the basic ideas that constitute the practice of leadership was exemplary. Complementing the movie were the reading articles – especially the one by John P. Kotter.

In addition to some of the key takeaways from the movie that have been identified in class, I’d like to throw some light on my personal philosophy on leadership:

It all begins with a vision and the desire to become a leader. It is a practice that is intentional and inherently values-based. My philosophy of leadership strongly subscribes to this viewpoint. The abilities or characteristics required of a leader are well emphasized in the movie and the articles. Of course, each one of us have their own “story of leadership” and will vary in different contexts. However, the most important dimension of leadership in my opinion is change. Thinking change, driving change and allowing change to sustain, completes a leader. Change in the context of ethics is merely what makes or defines a ‘good’ leadership. I would also extend the realm of leadership beyond the business world to our personal lives – we ‘lead’ ourselves constantly. We ‘follow’ our virtues, our thoughts and well-articulated plans. This in itself exhibits tremendous passion and diligence that others will find easy to follow – one of the traits of a ‘good’ leader.

What we learn in this class and more importantly from each other is what I believe this course is all about. I hope to learn a lot from all of you!!

January 16, 2008

Welcome!

Filed under: General — rrajasek @ 2:03 pm

Welcome to my J506 blog. This BLOG will be where I share some of my perspectives on the topic of Ethical Leadership and the practice of it…would greatly appreciate your comments!

Stay tuned….

Blog at WordPress.com.